Childbearing Motivation Survey (CBQ) (Miller, 1995). Software including 47 things split into a few separate balances: Positive Childbirth Inspiration (PCM) and you will Negative Childbearing Inspiration (NCM). The new PCM scale comprising twenty-seven situations will bring an overall total PCM get in four groups, which describe positive aspects of obtaining children: (1) delights of being pregnant, delivery, and youthfulness, (2) old-fashioned childbearing, (3) pleasure from increasing a young child, (4) effect requisite and you can linked, and you will (5) crucial philosophy. The fresh new NCM level includes 20 items that will bring an overall NCM score into the five groups, hence specify disadvantages out-of childbearing: (1) problems during pregnancy and you may childbearing, (2) adult fears and you can questions, (3) negative aspects regarding child care, and (4) adult stress. A cuatro-point Likert-variety of measure (4 = considerably, step three = reasonable, 2 = little, step one = not) is employed for this specific purpose. The procedure of translation and you may adaptation of the CBQ to possess Brazil was performed from the Varas and you may Borsa (2019). The fresh new assessment off inner surface is performed because of the calculating this new Omega coefficient ? (McDonald, 1999), and also the adopting the overall performance have been discover: PCM level (? = .96) and you can NCM measure(? = .92).
Dyadic Consensus Level (DCS) (Spanier, 1976, adapted by Hernandez, 2008). The dimensions demonstrated an enthusiastic Omega coefficient ? (McDonald, 1999) regarding .89.
Device setup for it look, aimed at meeting socio-demographic and you can family relations guidance, including physiological intercourse, decades, host to home, earnings, education, occupation, ong anyone else
Positivity size (PS) (Casio, Souza, Koller, & C). A keen seven-goods instrument one to examines the latest respondent’s positive advice in the himself/by herself and the coming. The scale displayed a keen Omega coefficient ? (McDonald, 1999) out of .86.
We provided heterosexual Brazilians from both genders as well as over age out-of 18
Survey towards experience regarding religiosity (QER). Instrument set up for it analysis based on questions utilized in Miller and you may Pasta’s lookup (1995). It’s composed of half dozen products which question the person’s involvement inside the spiritual practices plus the evaluation from religious precepts in each day existence alternatives. The size displayed an enthusiastic Omega coefficient ? (McDonald, 1999) regarding.89.
Members of the family Assistance Impact Collection (FSPI) (Baptista, 2005). Tool including 42 products that determine around three dimensions of loved ones support: (1) affective-uniform (AC) consisting of 21 items, hence cover points regarding regard of your own term regarding passion certainly one of members; (2) family members type (FA) composed of 13 products which get in the an ugly styles appearing its lack of version in the group and thinking bad thinking to your family members; (3) autonomy (A), consisting of seven items that evaluate the matchmaking from faith, liberty and you may confidentiality among members. The brand new FSPI facts shown the following Omega coefficients (McDonald, 1999): Air conditioning (? = .93), AF (? = .91) and you can An effective (? = .85).
Smaller Character S) (Hauck Filho, Machado, Teixeira, Bandeira, 2012). Instrument including twenty-five products which assess personality according to research by the Larger Four design: neuroticism (N), extroversion (E), socialization (S), conscientiousness (C), and you may openness to relax and play (OE). The RPMS issues demonstrated next Omega coefficients (McDonald, 1999): N (? = .77), Age (? = .77), S (? = .73), C (? = .73) and OE (? = .61).
Research collection. The participants was recruited because of social networking sites, with the snowball techniques (Patton, 1990), in which they datovГЎnГ muslim dospД›lГ© introduced the study to their co-worker. The latest exception to this rule off low-heterosexual people is due to the fact that studies to the CM done with these types of teams (Blake mais aussi al., 2017; van Houten, Tornello, Hoffenaar, & Bos, 2020) mean the requirement to were and you will problematize some private and you can contextual variables, and that address questions novel on their intimate fraction position, that have been maybe not sensed in this analysis. Analysis was collected practically via the on line platform Surveymonkey, anywhere between .